From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Two short questions about calc Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:31:52 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87y2lltcb2.fsf@web.de> <87362yu8k8.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38312"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 01 05:32:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpKc-0009sP-DD for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 01 Oct 2020 05:32:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48932 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpKb-0004iD-Ew for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:32:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpK2-0004i1-4b for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:22959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNpK0-0000fd-Jc for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B9E8F100222; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:31:55 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1F23F100071; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:31:54 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1601523114; bh=rFewQcm13VK3MjMC7xnfJVG1Fvp0wOXWcqdQwuJlw2E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pP+7pw4364CU7da1oDnWScUtJ9UlR7ycTtGi2CADqbNnGAK5TbictXoUURcW+X2sE /9gdqc01l9Ec23RjrF4lU8G48ZdO82ShxVL4vtUnKey490Nesq27018u4/sFa8fXWq OUnRSyBVewD0kh2ghUTrGJDd7PZ0faiSzbtKZRwHsWydaR0R3FdWu8FPjRrqGdNOCb sAAnOE69ATEIP05gxxvMixJDHwqC8PEH1HpU8yMbK6tirWKYRCUUXrGs4RaTB7LeO3 D5SytM3QYCHnBawJgYgx3XmJN7XjWWze6/WRZoEhQ47acr/EJ8AqvA4z5osKPU7rw4 d4ILDxKXQQWcw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8F0C1204DC; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 23:31:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87362yu8k8.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Thu, 01 Oct 2020 01:52:07 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/30 23:27:09 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:124228 Archived-At: >> > also a mode for tex output. If we already have tex, could we not just >> > ... tex that and insert the picture into the output buffer? I'm sure >> Hmm... is it me, or you forgot to attach the patch to your message? > No, it's you. ;-) > I works - most of the time -- sometimes I get "image has not been > created, check this and that" messages, I didn't yet investigate. The > good part is, Calc commands don't seem to interfere at all with this > hack. That's where I expected the real problems. Once it really works, > I would make it a separate language of course, "latexed-latex", > probably. Cool! Looks promising, Stefan