From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New multi-command facility displays in the wrong echo area. Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:47:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11813"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 09 22:01:39 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kQya5-0002qg-LZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 22:01:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52554 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQya4-0003nv-KN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 16:01:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQyMM-0006sx-IP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:47:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:15732) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQyMK-0004Bu-3i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2020 15:47:21 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E94258125D; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:47:17 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 837E0806A5; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:47:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1602272836; bh=TD45pqGJ5Wo8SqXIRG5U5OA3sDRv781HxhfDBx73zGg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=gCScVLujsy2xIJw/rYetr3L4/4yyKVL4SlzwHT4QhnXRrt2B1qhcqEDPPRtcqH+zO IM0RzgMNERS9WMPuVgZyibiZcOf3Pcj/8Q3ymg798fzUeQDYXXZUZRUJya6sPIStHi nKoJX0o/al07JekDp4Fm3NG09NrfTpRBfM5GRN6OILb23vjkPfoy1KflnX0zLGnxc3 AKqEvP64XpnWdKZk0LgLQq68WkBZqqfOHm1BrXc8I/z77PyB3vr3Y+NBotxdyhHs0p az25EtR+IFenF+Sr/+jvpAbRyFB1ua1wFeFvcoiUaQKrgxL9nPRy03aAFDJ1CWTl2V PQlwHnS2H00Fg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B90E1202FC; Fri, 9 Oct 2020 15:47:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20201009163445.GB4027@ACM> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Fri, 9 Oct 2020 16:34:45 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/09 15:47:18 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:257276 Archived-At: > (i) In a GUI environment, create two frames, each displaying a buffer. > (ii) In frame F1, do C-x b `switch-to-buffer', but don't type anything > more. > (iii) Move to frame F2, and start an isearch with C-s some-text. > > Although currently in F2, the isearch's pattern is displayed in the echo > area for F1. This is wrong. FWIW, this behavior has been with us at least since Emacs-21. Stefan