From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master f8fed41 2/3: image-dired: Improve XDG compliance Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:04:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83sfwp1c27.fsf@gnu.org> <87y26hqdxy.fsf@posteo.net> <87pmrtq99m.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23542"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 20:07:19 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mf4NS-0005sS-KQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 20:07:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35162 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf4NR-0000dT-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54464) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf4M3-0008Jh-DH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:05:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:10758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mf4Lz-0001du-B5; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id EC403807C8; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:05:44 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DF0958061E; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:05:42 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1635185142; bh=75ZK1RoTyBn+RfavoFaPDHV6xqLzBJDQJG5VEvyrCUs=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=L4P/QGyFXLP29fd4FXA9tmIuCKdX8Y9hGgO1H8dtkvSobT/hIM3gNoGMHY4eK8F7I dqbEU0XlNaakr0aJ5ljWp2oEIABa7bBGw3ciFNYp4YHl8nN794RK2QbDHofYwjvCp7 8aT7GH8R8hcgnb8djDA+M61P3NapHQaziLZ5hAQzO3852GufoGPq35xA3Eob4dASgZ FSNFtkBOOgR7fTdsAjQb/JrG7lBg8brwYbUtkb54YE33zI115zOlSX316TLqv2cigt 9qc07VqhKAOmWvRKO/WoWUKtY21fxbNW9ijx8Rgdb1Qun6v5AKXnz8oCSWF0ga+pUB DVk5WIEKh0a9w== Original-Received: from alfajor (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC2AB120210; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:05:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87pmrtq99m.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:55:33 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:277777 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic [2021-10-25 17:55:33] wrote: > Stefan Monnier writes: >> Philip Kaludercic [2021-10-25 16:14:33] wrote: >>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>>> XDG is also prone to fashion changes. What will we do when it goes >>>> out of fashion, and we have dozens of xdg-user-dir calls in our >>>> application code? change all of them to some latest desktop fashion? >>> What do you mean by this? >> The YEH spec from the Wayland++ guys is quite different, for one. > I have never heard of this, nor can I find any information about YEH. My Gnus from the future inferred those links from me, as usual. Maybe you're stuck with an old MUA from 2021 or so? Stefan