From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: feature/type-hierarchy 8a63e50036f 1/5: * Define 'cl--type-hierarchy' and compute 'cl--typeof-types' from it Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:35:19 -0500 Message-ID: References: <170801660982.26727.13226947668211497607@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240215170330.82819C0F009@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7051"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 04 17:36:40 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rhBIu-0001Z2-4r for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 17:36:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rhBHr-0005F9-Rj; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:35:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rhBHp-00059w-VE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:35:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rhBHl-0004Wj-Mo; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:35:33 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 79B7044499C; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:35:22 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1709570121; bh=AnAX5Kjb0xl+SOU22gSIcGQaRMXGmkjdR+5fdRNpS+o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=HrmASk7QtKZJJzRSw8p9GQQWuZK0trXbOCAfp2wsfgqQ8MLeuPbas9gphnMsSAFaR rIYkOTLDld1V0G9Eeg7kAMpi0O2Ty1ChcQBXcd8Kgw0mMeb0tO0DZHF3EXd5F1Z7AS yFA4DkA0WsOK4+pylmdi000abdrGG4MO172insRMe2YnFy/r8OJ3XjCY3TU7ncW5v7 IRdfTt6J2hkvroeyULRqCj/0x3BpfUjbBYEKmi1rHgA66dMlFvQ04nMmnmuL0JFwQK oVo+mDW6Y2vJfTQbEecZivtOfL82NpHvrUue61T9l0qA14fCt04D3pApzhrP6QQ+En LrwkLgnpNCNEA== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4B421444994; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:35:21 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [104.247.233.29]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C4DC1201DA; Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:35:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2024 11:12:16 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:316803 Archived-At: > I see, but I'm not thinking to the content of `cl--typeof-types`. I'm > thinking to the representation we generate for our doc with the type > hierarchy. I'm wondering if we should include `cl--class`, > `cl-structure-object`, `cl-structure-class` as built-in types. I guess it would make sense to include parts of the struct/EIEIO/OClosure hierarchy for people to understand how they fit alongside the "builtin" part, indeed. Stefan