From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7001: should `byte-compile-from-buffer' evaluate `binary-overwrite-mode' explicitly? Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:02:44 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284052227 8029 80.91.229.12 (9 Sep 2010 17:10:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 17:10:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 7001@debbugs.gnu.org To: MON KEY Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 09 19:10:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Otkdh-0006Or-8a for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:10:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56802 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Otkdg-0006wf-Pp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39010 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Otkdb-0006vq-E8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Otkda-0008W0-6k for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkdZ-0008Vs-VN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkUf-0007Sb-RL; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:01:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7001 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 7001-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7001.128405164728669 (code B ref 7001); Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7001) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Sep 2010 17:00:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkUQ-0007SM-OB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:00:46 -0400 Original-Received: from impaqm1.telefonica.net ([213.4.138.1]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OtkUO-0007SH-H6 for 7001@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:00:45 -0400 Original-Received: from IMPmailhost3.adm.correo ([10.20.102.124]) by IMPaqm1.telefonica.net with bizsmtp id 4c1H1f01A2h2L9m01h2lTv; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:02:45 +0200 Original-Received: from ceviche.home ([83.61.36.43]) by IMPmailhost3.adm.correo with BIZ IMP id 4h2k1f00H0vquEj1jh2li3; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:02:45 +0200 X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-TE-authinfo: authemail="monnier$movistar.es" |auth_email="monnier@movistar.es" X-TE-AcuTerraCos: auth_cuTerraCos="cosuitnetc01" Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C1497660D2; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 19:02:44 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (MON KEY's message of "Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:01:00 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:01:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40049 Archived-At: > Has this form: > (setq overwrite-mode 'overwrite-mode-binary) > Should this evalatate `binary-overwrite-mode' from simple.el instead? Probably not, since that would run binary-overwrite-mode-hook. Most likely this line can be removed from bytecomp.el. Stefan