From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8647: since lexical merge, declare-function in subr.el no longer works Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 22:02:49 -0300 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305162192 2791 80.91.229.12 (12 May 2011 01:03:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 01:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8647@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 12 03:03:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKJ0-00048v-GS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 May 2011 03:03:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKJ0-0001EN-2B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:40244) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIy-0001EI-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIw-000243-TM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIw-00023d-Ov for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIw-0000Sz-7A; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 01:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8647 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8647-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8647.13051621801785 (code B ref 8647); Thu, 12 May 2011 01:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8647) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 May 2011 01:03:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIt-0000Sj-Nd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:02:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIr-0000SX-FI for 8647@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:02:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 213-159-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.159.213]:41975 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QKKIl-0005Xa-MT; Wed, 11 May 2011 21:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 9372B66152; Wed, 11 May 2011 22:02:49 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 11 May 2011 14:12:48 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 21:03:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46406 Archived-At: > IMO, conceptually the right fix is for an element in > byte-compile-initial-macro-environment to _always_ take precedence > during compilation, even if the file being compiled contains a > redefinition. Agreed. Another way to get that result is to change the place where we add elements to byte-compile-macro-environment (so as not to add it if it's in byte-compile-initial-macro-environment), but the one you showed seems fine. Feel free to install it. Stefan