From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11847: 24.1.50; Error: Don't know how to compile #[nil "..."] Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:37:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6CFCB42782714EAEA0283E766D05BE7F@us.oracle.com> <01718D4EC241409DB101092AB41EAFA9@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342507108 31386 80.91.229.3 (17 Jul 2012 06:38:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11847@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 17 08:38:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1QP-0007Z3-1D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 08:38:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35182 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1QO-0001tn-5s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:38:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59359) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1QG-0001tN-D5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:38:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1Q5-0001Rh-K8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35594) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1Q5-0001R6-G4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1Vr-0002vo-4z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:44:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11847 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11847-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11847.134250744111248 (code B ref 11847); Tue, 17 Jul 2012 06:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11847) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2012 06:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45140 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1Vi-0002vG-9p for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:43:57 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:45510) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sr1VR-0002uZ-QU for 11847@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:43:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q6H6baPv030840; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id F2530AE508; Tue, 17 Jul 2012 02:37:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <01718D4EC241409DB101092AB41EAFA9@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 16 Jul 2012 22:50:16 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4281=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4281> : streams <786020> : uri <1167319> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62026 Archived-At: > Looking at your previous response, it seems to suggest only that the > _call_ to `icicle-cmd2-after-load-bookmark+' would not be > byte-compiled, because it is quoted. Indeed. Compilation looks at the text, not at the dynamic call-tree, so the code that's not textually inside a ' will be compiled just fine. > But the defuns (via the macro) that are in the body of > `icicle-cmd2-after-load-bookmark+': are they byte-compiled in the .elc > where `icicle-cmd2-after-load-bookmark+' is defined? Of course. > IOW, given those messages, I'm wondering again whether I really need the > (user-optional) calls to `icicle-maybe-byte-compile-after-load'. I was > supposing that I needed them because the definitions are inside an > `eval-after-load' (with a quoted sexp, as you mentioned). No, the definitions are not inside an eval-after-load. They are *evaluated* from an eval-after-load, but they are not *located* inside it. Stefan