From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Alternative D-Bus bindings Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:18 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ligjmmqw.fsf@gmx.de> <87fw6rm0cw.fsf@gmx.de> <6o4nn66bf6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <087B6317-06A4-40A7-8FBC-98131AEB28D6@swipnet.se> <87vcfl9ahj.fsf@gmx.de> <87bohdmz8t.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1347311248 1298 80.91.229.3 (10 Sep 2012 21:07:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dj=E4rv?= , James Cloos , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 10 23:07:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBCa-0000pS-HL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 23:07:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBCW-0004Cq-R5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBCU-0004CO-K7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBCT-0005De-JL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:60704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TBBCT-0005DR-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:21 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q8AL7Ixq026695; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:18 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C74C2B4085; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:07:18 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bohdmz8t.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 10 Sep 2012 21:52:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153225 Archived-At: >> I don't see a particular problem in requiring glib to be able to build >> with D-Bus support. The situation where someone would want to build an >> Emacs that supports D-Bus but with a configuration which doesn't use >> glib seems rather unlikely. > I did understand James, that he doesn't need D-Bus, and he doesn't want > a glib dependency in his athena-based build because of D-Bus. > "with-dbus" is the default configure option in Emacs. If he doesn't want glib, then he'll have to explicitly disable dbus, which I think is an acceptable price to pay. Stefan