From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: removal of `string-to-sequence' Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:09:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349269866 15831 80.91.229.3 (3 Oct 2012 13:11:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 13:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 03 15:11:11 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TJOiV-0001Rb-Ca for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 15:10:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55184 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJOiP-0006D3-NK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:10:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41997) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJOi3-00060d-QR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:10:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJOhR-0006YQ-3Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:09:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:44707) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TJOhQ-0006YJ-Uk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Oct 2012 09:09:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLQG/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0QAROIHAW6CZBEA4sbkDuHXYFYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="200547447" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.6]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 03 Oct 2012 09:09:16 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2C108594E8; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:09:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 2 Oct 2012 21:59:03 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154002 Archived-At: > I byte-compile my code in Emacs 20 and use the result in 20 and later > releases. Until now (the Windows binary that I picked up today), that > has never been a problem. We do not even try to be backward compatible with code written for Emacs-21 (since all the features "obsolete since Emacs<22" are removed from the trunk, except for time-to-seconds). Byte-compiled or not doesn't make much of a difference in this respect. Stefan