From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Inhibit "Wrote foo" from write-region Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:00 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k3dte17j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390418415 1781 80.91.229.3 (22 Jan 2014 19:20:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 19:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Tom Tromey , Emacs-Devel devel To: Sebastian Wiesner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 22 20:20:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W63LX-0000FZ-As for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:20:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37168 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W63LW-0002wU-Qz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W63LN-0002vU-AO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W63LG-0005Jq-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:09 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:2315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W63LF-0005HS-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:01 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rxHA/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAScvIwULCw4mEhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFG4rxHA/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAScvIwULCw4mEhQYDSSIHgbBLZEKA4hhnBmBXoMV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="45622483" Original-Received: from 184-175-17-192.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([184.175.17.192]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 22 Jan 2014 14:20:01 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C418360323; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:20:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Sebastian Wiesner's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2014 18:08:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168916 Archived-At: > There is a typo ("ni" -> "nil"), and I don't exactly understand what the > other changes unrelated to write-region are for. Other than that, looks > good. Thanks, installed. > Just out of curiosity: What is the rationale behind these messages? > Why does write-region even print these messages? There's the obvious case where write-region is called interactively. I guess the behavior is inherited from this case. Stefan