From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Overlay mechanic improvements Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:42:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <871tr6qup8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83zjdsyks8.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411325028 11116 80.91.229.3 (21 Sep 2014 18:43:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 18:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 21 20:43:40 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XVm6l-0001OF-LT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:43:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40541 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVm6l-0003wX-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:43:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59038) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVm6b-0003vK-BI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:43:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVm6T-0004Jq-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:43:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:39339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XVm6E-0004Hr-5l; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:43:06 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegeEOAEDqRmBaoNMIQ X-IPAS-Result: ArUGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABZgwaDSsA9gRcXdIIlAQEBAQIBViMFCws0EhQYDSSIBAjSGReOegeEOAEDqRmBaoNMIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="90487550" Original-Received: from 69-165-145-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([69.165.145.6]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Sep 2014 14:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 996CBAE80E; Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:42:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83zjdsyks8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Sep 2014 19:56:39 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174617 Archived-At: > Overlays can overlap, while text properties cannot. Does that matter > for what intervals.c implement? Of course it does, but the algorithm I suggest we use handles it just fine. Stefan