From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Unbalanced change hooks (part 2) Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:36:42 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160731121642.GB2205@acm.fritz.box> <83a8gxq288.fsf@gnu.org> <20160731172804.GD2205@acm.fritz.box> <83vazlobh1.fsf@gnu.org> <83r3a8oct5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1470062154 15537 80.91.229.8 (1 Aug 2016 14:35:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:35:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 01 16:35:39 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bUEJf-0003fk-4A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:35:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50706 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUEJb-0002xH-Am for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUEJ1-0002cM-Eu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUEIv-00063M-Ms for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:56256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bUEIv-00063E-I2; Mon, 01 Aug 2016 10:34:53 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id u71EYp17013970; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4BBD060318; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:36:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83r3a8oct5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:09:58 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5753=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5753> : inlines <5057> : streams <1677122> : uri <2258727> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206311 Archived-At: > Btw, it looks like insert-file-contents deliberately doesn't call > before-change-functions if nothing was inserted, even if some text was > deleted. Sounds like a bug. > I wonder why. The way the code is written, it cannot be a > coincidence. Coincidence or not, the b-c-f should we warned about the change. Stefan