From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master c75eb10: Don't change byte-compile-delete-errors at runtime (Bug#27340) Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:44 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170624141528.514.4459@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170624141530.443C5210EB@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87r2y28ule.fsf@gnu.org> <871sq28sk0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1498769428 25392 195.159.176.226 (29 Jun 2017 20:50:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 20:50:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Noam Postavsky , Emacs developers To: Johan =?windows-1252?Q?Bockg=E5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 29 22:50:23 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgOM-0006GZ-MI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:50:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgOS-0008UI-0G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48061) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgNu-0008Tu-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgNo-0000uz-HT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:54 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:56128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQgNo-0000uj-C4; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:48 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v5TKniJd000637; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:45 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id BD3906627F; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:49:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <871sq28sk0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Johan =?windows-1252?Q?Bockg=E5rd?= =?windows-1252?Q?=22's?= message of "Thu, 29 Jun 2017 22:09:19 +0200") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6059=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6059> : inlines <5957> : streams <1752065> : uri <2453206> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:216052 Archived-At: > The Hyperspec says that: > > 1. [declaim should] make definitions available both in the compilation > and run-time environments. Hmm... the uses of declaim that I'm familiar with are optimization settings for the compiler. These don't "make definitions available" AFAICT. If foo.el contains a declaim to set the optimization level, I don't see why it would make sense for this setting to affect all files compiled after foo.elc was loaded (I can understand that the spec may allow such a suboptimal behavior, but not that it would require it). Stefan