From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pure-fns in byte-opt.el Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:49:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170725020650.GA12601@holos.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501264254 9037 195.159.176.226 (28 Jul 2017 17:50:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:50:54 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 28 19:50:50 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1db9PT-0001yg-RJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:50:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49409 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db9PZ-0001jF-NP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:50:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60493) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db9Oy-0001j8-Hq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:50:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db9Ov-0004sr-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:50:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40219 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1db9Ov-0004sP-9j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 13:50:13 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1db9Oh-00080e-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:49:59 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:SPTa3sUMzrHtxQq6399RW4hqWJk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217110 Archived-At: > Hmm. I get the argument, but wouldn't that mean that only a tiny set of > builtins were pure? Indeed, according to that definition of pure, very few Elisp functions qualify. Which is why this is not exactly the definition used for pure-fns. Stefan