From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Smie-auto-fill =?utf-8?Q?doesn=E2=80=99t?= respect comment-auto-fill-only-comments Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2017 16:50:07 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87o9vdj0s5.fsf@tromey.com> <87mvavw0h5.fsf@pokyo> <87r2zidut2.fsf@bapiya> <87d1b1e7e3.fsf@bapiya> <87a85vcqcc.fsf@bapiya> <87379592bm.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501966234 30695 195.159.176.226 (5 Aug 2017 20:50:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Aug 2017 20:50:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 05 22:50:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1de61l-0007Ux-SZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:50:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58719 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1de61n-0000Mh-FJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 16:50:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35601) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1de61h-0000MV-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 16:50:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1de61e-0001V3-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 16:50:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=46574 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1de61e-0001Tn-3l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 16:50:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1de61R-0006jE-UJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Aug 2017 22:50:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:5MqmIj/WAEZCiItpuTRfmA0aAJw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217330 Archived-At: > I keep getting bitten by this problem and I wonder whether here you > meant that I could check in the patch as-is, without fixing up all of > comment-indent-new-line. Yes, that's what I meant. > Also, I still wonder whether prog-mode should set > comment-auto-fill-only-comments to t. I tend to think so. Personally, I'm fine with changing the default like you suggest. But let's keep it as a separate question. Stefan