From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug-reference-prog-mode slows down CC Mode's scrolling by ~7% Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:00:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83a6kuyysv.fsf@gnu.org> <837dfwyird.fsf@gnu.org> <83tuj0ux6y.fsf@gnu.org> <83pmtouul2.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0jwus8w.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0jngtub.fsf@gnu.org> <837dfnghgi.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9720"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: acm@muc.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 11 20:02:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mP7Ko-0002QD-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 20:02:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41904 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mP7Km-00075D-SV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:02:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mP7JH-0006Gw-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:35852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mP7JF-0004ch-Hq; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 0DEC880152; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:01:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg2.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8831C806C6; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:01:04 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1631383264; bh=DEFVKIeC0F9o75u8AfvkReE147VoeJhb0aP85F72f+0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=S2K57CsFq2XvthlEuGkzKfmYz+SalE9uHmvrDfONWgltLPBvQ1s2JeX3MYUDMzXla f5DJ7508mfbWsGnLxl+458usFPKv5NWHrSgqER147v4yp20d0EFbRXd3MRqcZBwODe b6MnEtTXNEbVhNYqYkUJk6vM5SpH3DY3rzRWQAwYMSKd2TIJzV/MW/qPBf/xzyCmKn S5glKB+vUJjBbEpzdCE3GJwe6g3U8OAtE9yiOsg6z/snrCOhDcxjcuolkFsQpsyJ5X qPQ/RuKsapaZvVzu7rH+VhMPwzNEMfJfXECjC1MSM3Unxn0SxfMde602uYLNgSMC+y Tt/B37kI5RDzQ== Original-Received: from milanesa (unknown [45.72.241.23]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67B43120329; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 14:00:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <837dfnghgi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 11 Sep 2021 20:17:17 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:274558 Archived-At: >> Maybe a good way to see the waste is to measure the time for the >> initial font-lock in an outline-mode buffer where the screen is >> filled with single-line headers and everything else is hidden: >> a whole chunk will be fontified for each line, so with a single >> 40-line screen you can expect to fontify 40 chunks (unless the >> hidden text between lines is smaller than the chunk size, of >> course). > > That's okay, but the thing is we do fontify invisible text, and 1500 > characters could be easily 40 lines, so the probability of more than > that to be hidden is not large, except in unusual cases like reading > Lisp in Outline mode with all the code hidden. Where, your "unusual" is my default, so I'm quite happy that jit-lock optimizes this case ;-) Stefan