From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#60333: [PATCH] whitespace: Update bob, eob markers in base and indirect buffers Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:31 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87k02dz75f.fsf@localhost> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15540"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 60333@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Hansen To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 27 15:51:24 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pABIa-0003pE-EC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 15:51:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pABIH-0003k8-22; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:51:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pABIE-0003ja-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pABIE-00057W-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pABIE-0003HP-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 14:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 60333 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 60333-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B60333.167215264912581 (code B ref 60333); Tue, 27 Dec 2022 14:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 60333) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Dec 2022 14:50:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54956 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pABI0-0003Gq-Qz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:32723) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pABHy-0003GY-Cs for 60333@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:47 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 73D721000DA; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:40 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id BDC4D10002F; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:38 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1672152638; bh=IDXA7kjJy24/5ugk9ZBvgwfkxhu3Vyqim0MTcjk6EU4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=lbqfomsmvanzWToQuHs21zwMG7Q2R49JBCMpj2kyrh0nmMCfMyudZj6YD/12G+Ic7 Mx7/Dzw1PYRuyBE19z3+rBPIk5+xq415meo7glUwloJ3z4aNma1DJIMHlilK21Mg+V FUdyAZNna6T/SzDMoeE2bqRYtSE3S13UnCrOeZoye6v74jH6nxk+5VW6gTfIFUwnXc zwh0OjS3mO8N8axGNcWPH/66LzENgtsw5DbPKVGOhjBIzkKxMdI6PL7HJC87H+AtTc jObBQ0Lxvn0ws6nCquxjDsA1iStEwTQv0iDlnM3n0uGPFPCSTkGjQbN97+drin2iRI cGR8EIYV/6v8Q== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.200.228]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 967DB120A9F; Tue, 27 Dec 2022 09:50:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87k02dz75f.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Tue, 27 Dec 2022 06:34:52 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:251955 Archived-At: >> +(defvar whitespace--indirect-buffers nil >> + "Plist mapping a base buffer to a list of its indirect buffers. >> +Used to work around Bug#46982.") > Org uses a similar variable for similar purposes. > Would it make more sense to expose the list of indirect buffers for a > given buffer in more centralized way? "Expose" is the wrong term, because we don't have that info ready to be exposed. We'd either have to create&maintain that list, or compute it on-demand when requested. We could export some way for ELisp to check if BUFFER is the base buffer of some other indirect buffers so as to skip the loop through `buffer-list` in the common case. So that sane code (i.e. code which doesn't use indirect buffers) doesn't pay for the careless users of that anti-feature :-) If it weren't for backward compatibility, I'd suggest to make `buffer-base-buffer` return t (rather than nil) when BUFFER is the base buffer of other indirect buffers. Stefan