From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] externals/org 26ef5e3e5b: org-src: Use `sh-mode' for all the shells it can handle Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <168174708495.14139.12756054653439048176@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20230417155805.3E200C1391A@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87bkjmh3st.fsf@posteo.net> <47F08B58-0F0B-4139-850F-C8CD72E0C052@acm.org> <8E317554-E278-446B-B5F9-7FA97F97D63F@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1216"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Philip Kaludercic , Lynn Winebarger , Matthew Trzcinski , emacs-devel To: Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 17 22:09:35 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1poVAM-00007H-Kk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 22:09:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poV9V-00024b-U9; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poV9U-000246-BP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1poV9P-0004OA-TR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:39 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4EAD61000BE; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:34 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 1202110000A; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1681762113; bh=+FNrrkcM1CplqFpF1rdTUldHMqkBWRbOJUy1Jfm9R9Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=NBaNMJvzyc1ADyv7VCvDgDqDncdxKAvk5EMrLkq6ZyV38qkspzRDgQy1qv//sU6kP A6IXBVafrkVO32JAB98Swg8+Fg10b7/UNW+g/GpKIj5rA7M+H1yD3fFUOenbqasQK7 ZHMIzWxkVlOMEV63EpzH4IoBn4GJou0z+rryUI36aB+Vn9HDEysy3I3Q+FPSNeACrv Ey9a/uA4UOIh+KAjkWvVzHIwV8dCHzbXFX34Pp5DCAW+QDGR2SFkwuYyuJrJzclqD+ 1IP5BDtTZDxVjnIloT5RgBipt+gzdc4pBz8TTKUBGdF5TM5ZH8NtlXPwrXZhvUcax6 M+G1fucV1e4HQ== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.217.176]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B5A9C1203D4; Mon, 17 Apr 2023 16:08:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <8E317554-E278-446B-B5F9-7FA97F97D63F@acm.org> ("Mattias =?windows-1252?Q?Engdeg=E5rd=22's?= message of "Mon, 17 Apr 2023 20:33:40 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:305387 Archived-At: >> How 'bout adding&using `list*` instead? > I wouldn't mind adding `list*` at all. (It would eventually compile to list + nconc, of course.) I was thinking of adding it as a C-implemented function. It might still lose to list+nconc unless we also give it a bytecode, tho. Stefan