From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 5a125fb5a97 1/2: Update to Org 9.7.3 Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: <171796793548.23337.12512115872160390161@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240609211858.A2C31C1F9FB@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87a5jtd403.fsf@yahoo.com> <87h6e1lhtd.fsf@kyleam.com> <868qzd9hjg.fsf@gnu.org> <871q53u75e.fsf@localhost> <8634pj7jni.fsf@gnu.org> <87cyom6zkd.fsf@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28060"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , kyle@kyleam.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ihor Radchenko Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 12 16:42:13 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sHPAy-00079T-RJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 16:42:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHPAP-0007XP-VM; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHPAN-0007VG-Om for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sHPAL-0002Wy-Pi; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:35 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 7C77F100043; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:31 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1718203290; bh=wp9AYf5e+ymUbAJukhoz6SgHfWoiTvxbvIzoVKQ+KN8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=heQWz35tsrfTXplyLNqyirRcuR2t9qzR+iIo94q1hNtLYiSIYZfSAqedjwMsOqw5U eBCeiWRq/nJ6CCXGdiSNjgS8z2hwqxJL/UvAjfNa0i3rGzmNdep9d5+puShWs6721B pN2MHfA93q0byskQM4ybab+trimC1lWft15HaJ1+Qwn4pT4Vsij1idCVknpqDLz7ip ek9W5Lvq5ZzlqN0uHf282uhHHqM5sqloXS/QHhOQe2MWmkxfK2bIC+/SnG7VmueSTG knZcQLF3OgYLDnzR501/U+cYJqwGPXCTkJI6EnLeA6uoZkiIHhB+Af1pbU7N4ghBEu KjXemxxteCgew== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A01A5100035; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:30 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from lechazo (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F7C51204B0; Wed, 12 Jun 2024 10:41:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87cyom6zkd.fsf@localhost> (Ihor Radchenko's message of "Wed, 12 Jun 2024 13:49:38 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320002 Archived-At: >>>> Note that org-num.el where `org-num-skip-tags' is defined does have >>>> (require 'cl-lib). >>>> IMHO, there is some problem either with loaddefs generation or with the >>>> fact that loaddefs file is compiled at all. >> Code that's in an ;;;###autoload cookie is copied verbatim to the >> loaddefs file, so it cannot assume that all the earlier code in the file >> (e.g. the `(require 'cl)` at the beginning of the file) has been execute= d. > Then, it would be helpful if such problems were caught during > byte-compilation. It is caught when compiling the `org-loaddefs.el` file. =F0=9F=99=82 I suspect that catching it during compilation of `org-table.el` is pretty far from what the current compiler code can do. Stefan