From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@siege-engine.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: CEDET version
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 14:10:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ju1uddqbje.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FE1044.1010307@siege-engine.com> (Eric M. Ludlam's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:06:28 -0500")
"Eric M. Ludlam" wrote:
>> There are various things that this affects; see M-x list-packages
>> output. semantic, srecode, inversion, pulse, ede, etc. They all have
>> different version numbers at present.
>
> These used to all go out separately and were later merged into once
> CEDET package. Is there a reason to version-merge them?
I'm not asking for any changes like that, I'm just asking for someone to
who knows about CEDET versioning to check that all the version numbers
the components have in Emacs make sense. Eg the first one I look at is
semantic.el, which says:
;; Version: 2.0
[...]
(defvar semantic-version "2.1beta"
Ie, inconsistent in the same way that cedet.el is.
I don't have any opinion on what the version numbers should be, I am
saying that these two should be consistent, and asking what value to
use. I have no idea what version of CEDET, semantic, etc are actually in
Emacs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 9:57 Emacs pretest 24.2.92 sindikat
2013-01-17 23:38 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-18 1:59 ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2013-01-18 2:09 ` CEDET version [was Re: Emacs pretest 24.2.92] Glenn Morris
2013-01-21 2:20 ` CEDET version Glenn Morris
2013-01-21 19:13 ` David Engster
2013-01-22 2:00 ` Glenn Morris
2013-01-22 4:06 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-01-22 19:10 ` Glenn Morris [this message]
2013-01-22 22:51 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-01-23 7:38 ` David Engster
2013-01-23 13:17 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-01-23 20:39 ` David Engster
2013-01-31 0:04 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-01-31 20:08 ` David Engster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ju1uddqbje.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rgm@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=eric@siege-engine.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.