From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 2ec8f28: Introduce defcustom 'executable-prefix-env' Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:47:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20170722073452.31002.6998@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170722073453.C375420329@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83wp6x7qgw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1501087689 27303 195.159.176.226 (26 Jul 2017 16:48:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:48:09 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: slewsys@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 26 18:48:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1daPTh-0006vU-5n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 18:48:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daPTn-0006O8-2O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:48:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56053) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daPTX-0006Ib-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:47:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daPTX-0000Zc-0G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:47:55 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:47555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daPTW-0000ZW-T0; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1daPTW-0002qn-2z; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 12:47:54 -0400 X-Spook: Relief Methamphetamine Pork Human to Human SP4 Ammonium X-Ran: ri}|8ifCNrd38f8}XsuX'Aw+>Y7YD*b&);nI=3rmO($t6$xo>rV5y42z,^&"?eLA?[S'8_ X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <83wp6x7qgw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 24 Jul 2017 19:24:31 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:217048 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I don't think I've seen a :version bump used for "not new and no change >> in default, but deprecated". > > But do you see anything wrong with doing that? I didn't, so I left it > as submitted by the author. It's not part of the documented meaning for :version ("This keyword specifies that the item was first introduced in Emacs version VERSION, or that its default value was changed in that version"). There's a standard method for deprecating options, to mark them obsolete; so yes, I think using :version for that is wrong.