From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:02:05 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87fwemnbft.fsf@escher.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328648590 22175 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 21:03:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10751@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Stephen Berman" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:03:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBx-0002wK-9S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:03:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41417 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBw-0006TN-Fv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:03:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:35585) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBu-0006T5-5s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBt-0003Do-35 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55831) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBt-0003Dk-1b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:03:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusCo-0000Hm-CI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:04:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:04:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 10751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10751.13286485861023 (code B ref 10751); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:04:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2012 21:03:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBt-0000GR-Fq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49901 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusBr-0000GL-Vn for 10751@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:03:04 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RusAv-0007j4-9u; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:02:05 -0500 X-Spook: TWA Khaddafi Croatian sniper kilo class INS Mahmoud X-Ran: WDMF-aG&tk:THbWjPM]>E0jONk*}Ne|4_KU(hfM5QdB.CtDnjB$ (Stephen Berman's message of "7 Feb 2012 12:13:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56671 Archived-At: "Stephen Berman" wrote: > => My mailbox received two copies of the email, both sent to the address > in the To: header line. > In both there is no Bcc: header line That's the nature of BCC, no? >, and there was no email sent to the address in the Bcc: header line. Works for me. I don't supposed your bcc address somehow redirects to the To address? That would explain why you get two copies.