all messages for Emacs-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@glug.org>
Cc: samuel@ma.hw.ac.uk
Subject: Re: emacs-19.34 segfaults when built with Xfree 4.3.0(glibc2.3.x,gcc 3.2)
Date: 12 May 2003 16:36:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <jkptmnuckl.fsf@glug.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Hin-Tak Leung's message of "Mon, 12 May 2003 20:00:56 +0100"

Hin-Tak Leung <hintak_leung@yahoo.co.uk> writes:

   (Sigh). I would have been a lot happier if one of you had
   replied with "get me a gdb back strace" than having to digress
   to lengthy philosphical discussion on reasons to use an
   older version, or resorting to foul languages.

although it is encouraging that you know yourself well enough to say
this, i confess to not feeling comfortable ordering you about like an
employee.  these lengthy discussions surely would be better replaced by
some concrete information (as "concrete" as information can be ;-), it
seems you're saying.  the reasons for using this version (or any version
for that matter) are not really germaine to debugging the problem, you
also note.

   As I said, I would prefer a "yes" or "no" to the gdb debug
   question. It isn't to difficult to answer either:
   (1) "possibly, depending on how deep the problem is; can't promise"
   (2) "Sorry no, no eperience with gdb whatsoever"

what if some people on the list respond (1) and some people respond
(2) -- what have you gained and/or lost by this exercise?

   But you are trying to draw into philosophical discussion again.
   (I guess that's still better than the "get a f*cking life"
   or "cheeky f*cker" replies)

a personal quirk, no doubt: all discussion is philosophical to me, even
those involving hard bits of free software artifact (both pre- and post-
core dump ;-).

   If I had sounded impatient, I had not resort to verbal
   violence as some others did.

sometimes the sudden move is easy to interpret as both violent and
beautiful, and sometimes funny and sometimes sad.  where there is room
for interpretation there is room for misunderstanding (and bugs!).

thi

  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-12 20:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-12 14:40 emacs-19.34 segfauls when built with Xfree 4.3.0 (glibc 2.3.x,gcc 3.2) Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-12 15:22 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-05-12 16:12   ` emacs-19.34 segfaults when built with Xfree 4.3.0 (glibc2.3.x,gcc 3.2) Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-12 17:18     ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-05-12 17:51       ` emacs-19.34 segfaults when built with Xfree 4.3.0(glibc2.3.x,gcc 3.2) Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-12 18:15         ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2003-05-12 19:00           ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-12 20:36             ` Thien-Thi Nguyen [this message]
2003-05-12 22:11               ` Hin-Tak Leung
     [not found]               ` <mailman.6068.1052777215.21513.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
2003-05-13  7:07                 ` Kai Großjohann
     [not found] ` <20030512164103.1607f814.samuel@ma.hw.ac.uk>
2003-05-12 16:25   ` emacs-19.34 segfauls when built with Xfree 4.3.0 (glibc 2.3.x,gcc 3.2) Hin-Tak Leung
     [not found]     ` <20030512180149.371bb9d5.samuel@ma.hw.ac.uk>
2003-05-12 17:29       ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-12 22:41         ` Sam Halliday
2003-05-12 22:52           ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-14  2:51         ` Eli Zaretskii
2003-05-14 13:48 ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-14 16:34   ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-15 15:42     ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-15 18:27       ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-16 10:38       ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-16 11:40         ` Andreas Schwab
2003-05-16 12:11           ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-16 12:40             ` Andreas Schwab
2003-05-16 17:11               ` Hin-Tak Leung
2003-05-17 13:50         ` Richard Stallman
2003-05-17 17:40           ` Hin-Tak Leung
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-29  7:57 emacs-19.34 segfaults when built with Xfree 4.3.0 (glibc2.3.x,gcc 3.2) Tomoyuki Murakami

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=jkptmnuckl.fsf@glug.org \
    --to=ttn@glug.org \
    --cc=samuel@ma.hw.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.