From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: display question: should ^N and \NNN widths be fixed? Date: 27 May 2002 02:48:14 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1022482275 30362 127.0.0.1 (27 May 2002 06:51:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 06:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17CELb-0007tb-00 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 08:51:15 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17CEco-0007Ok-00 for ; Mon, 27 May 2002 09:09:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17CEM7-0008OZ-00; Mon, 27 May 2002 02:51:47 -0400 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.85.68]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17CEIj-00084X-00; Mon, 27 May 2002 02:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 17CEIg-0008E6-00; Mon, 27 May 2002 02:48:14 -0400 Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 26 May 2002 08:09:28 +0300 (IDT)" Original-Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4415 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4415 Eli Zaretskii writes: Emacs will support bidirectional display [...] The current code in indent.c assumes that buffer positions increase monotonically with screen positions. I'm not saying that you should do my job of lifting that limitation, but please keep this in mind when you design and code the new indent.c, so that changing it for bidi Emacs would not be harder than it is today. what makes it difficult to support this lifting, today? what makes supporting that lifting difficult in general? thi