From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Semantics of font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function Date: 10 Jun 2002 17:49:23 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5bzny44l3c.fsf@lister.roxen.com> <200206101451.g5AEpGj28443@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023745900 7199 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2002 21:51:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 21:51:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Martin Stjernholm , emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17HX4e-0001s0-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:51:40 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17HXRf-0003TW-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 00:15:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HX48-0005r7-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:51:09 -0400 Original-Received: from colo.agora-net.com ([207.245.85.68]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HX2b-0005mm-00 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:49:33 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 17HX2R-0008LJ-00; Mon, 10 Jun 2002 17:49:23 -0400 Original-To: "Stefan Monnier" In-Reply-To: "Stefan Monnier"'s message of "Mon, 10 Jun 2002 10:51:16 -0400" Original-Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4723 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4723 "Stefan Monnier" writes: It's OK for `syntax-begin-function' (font-lock-beginning-of-syntax-function should be obsoleted) not to move to the very top-level as long as users of syntax-ppss don't depend on it. would you recommend something like `backward-up-list' for this? thi