From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: joaotavora@gmail.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_T=E1vora?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [mentoring-done] a darkroom/writeroom mode for Emacs Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:55:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20141203142859.24393.98673@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <83y4qm2uz9.fsf@gnu.org> <83vblq2los.fsf@gnu.org> <87vblpjq24.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <83mw7119yz.fsf@gnu.org> <87sigqiaaz.fsf@gmx.us> <878uihhv5q.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnnczcjg.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnna11ez.fsf@pank.eu> <87wq5xxe6g.fsf@gmx.us> <86zjap6p0c.fsf@yandex.ru> <548EE68C.4070600@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418651763 13577 80.91.229.3 (15 Dec 2014 13:56:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:56:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Rasmus , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 15 14:55:58 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0W7w-0003Wj-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:55:57 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39850 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0W7w-0006Rj-Hy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:55:56 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49208) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0W7p-0006RV-3o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:55:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0W7k-0004GQ-AV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:55:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]:48677) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0W7j-0004GA-Tz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:55:44 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so10553624wib.3 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:55:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=sICKbTaRdBL8tXvxdEw/Ms9ipZHggiHE/VzctsNSBYw=; b=OWacn4/GvTnuyT2jbNlcV6deYUSd1491NyndzMF2k69hRq8C16/NQrdJ0fHHZh9N/0 WsuELZb8VGSoy7NdZVzqD+QYv97KI+4ZMJM2YtxrS+NPXPHQ+gYkIkDWnMuD17zFe6Xm i1EkvAGyvCPd3c42IXLrUqiwRL5DwBT+9jsvGZH/37KtzouN8Gi33N2EWW0REu+lTda0 pq128wz/Zf4peqlGysB6DH6/Q+zajMbP7GTiux+XsoxZKnnQ0MIb1ANjJb0xks2TabOO WAEmbJ/GnxPqyidn4dSkdtniGjqk88PkeuSZ8/o5PX/ZJXdj48DJBAXKuKLGjtVOVvVk iiBQ== X-Received: by 10.180.96.33 with SMTP id dp1mr31701901wib.13.1418651743142; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:55:43 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from GONDOMAR.yourcompany.com (53.236.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt. [93.108.236.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id je12sm13343240wic.22.2014.12.15.05.55.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 05:55:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <548EE68C.4070600@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 15 Dec 2014 15:47:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (windows-nt) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180149 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > That's right. Check out the README: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/elpa.git/tree/README Indeed this README thing you speak of is quite useful. :-) > I think so, can't really say for sure if that's the only > difference. I'm not clear on what your strategy will do under the > covers. Actually, I'd expect both your approaches to do more "under the covers", (mine just uses the more common "merge" and "mv" primitives). That's why I want to understand them. It's just a question of "git merge --help" or inspecting the local result before pushing.