From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:03:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> <86ejae96t4.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205499926 29400 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2008 13:05:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, dak@gnu.org, Matthieu Moy , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Fri Mar 14 14:05:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ja9a4-0006nz-Vc for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:04:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja9ZT-0003Ft-16; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:03:39 +0000 Original-Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15] helo=mx2.suse.de) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja9ZQ-0003Fo-9n for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:03:36 +0000 Original-Received: from Relay1.suse.de (relay-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998A83B2BF; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:03:35 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I am covered with pure vegetable oil and I am writing a best seller! In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri\, 14 Mar 2008 14\:40\:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38559 gmane.emacs.devel:92539 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Incidentally, why are we concentrating on "bzr log"? is that a > frequent operation? IMHO it is. It is the main source of revision information. But it also happend to be the first command that I tried after the clone. > Aren't "push" and "pull" much more important, as far as speed is > concerned, for everyday work? Those are important, too, but I could not test them yet. > Also the equivalent of "cvs diff", I think. Those are the ops I use > much more frequently than "log" and "annotate". Yes, "diff" is quite important as well. Unfortunately, bzr diff seems to have the same performance problem. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."