From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8562053f49b38b1584b86e1e4d1ec6e6,vpqbq5htrwx.fsf@bauges.imag.fr> <47DA72A8.8010807@mapscape.eu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205499970 29586 80.91.229.12 (14 Mar 2008 13:06:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, David Kastrup , Matthieu Moy , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Ingamells Original-X-From: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Fri Mar 14 14:06:38 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ja9c2-0007MB-D2 for gcvbg-bazaar-ng@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:06:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja9bT-0003pc-Bo; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:05:43 +0000 Original-Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]) by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ja9bR-0003p8-PK for bazaar@lists.canonical.com; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:05:41 +0000 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (relay-ext.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8023489E; Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:41 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Am I accompanied by a PARENT or GUARDIAN? In-Reply-To: <47DA72A8.8010807@mapscape.eu> (David Ingamells's message of "Fri\, 14 Mar 2008 13\:42\:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: bazaar@lists.canonical.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8 Precedence: list List-Id: bazaar discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Errors-To: bazaar-bounces@lists.canonical.com Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38560 gmane.emacs.devel:92540 Archived-At: David Ingamells writes: > When we were choosing a new CMS tool I did a similar comparison between > mercurial and bazaar, which mercurial won easily until I discovered why= : > mercurial first uses time stamps to check for potential updates - which > leads to lost updates if the file update happens within one second of t= he > checkout. bazaar is more thorough when checking for changes - this cost= s > time but is much safer. But it shouldn't result in a 60 seconds delay. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."