From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pending-undo-list - should it not be buffer local? Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:11:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <460DB19B.30102@gmail.com> <460E25B2.3050001@gmail.com> <460E38DF.9060807@gmail.com> <460E3E83.3080408@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1175339539 28889 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2007 11:12:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:12:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel To: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 31 13:12:11 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HXbVB-00077T-3n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:12:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbXy-0004dB-9g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:15:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbXt-0004ci-1c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:14:57 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbXr-0004cP-6n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HXbXr-0004cG-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 06:14:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HXbV2-0004Uw-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 07:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF9C21714; Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:11:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: Let's climb to the TOP of that MOUNTAIN and think about STRIP MINING!! In-Reply-To: <460E3E83.3080408@gmail.com> (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sat, 31 Mar 2007 12:57:07 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:68833 Archived-At: "Lennart Borgman (gmail)" writes: > Are you sure this true even if kill-all-local-variables are called from > post-command-hook or from a timer? If so can you please explain to me w= hy? It doesn't matter anyway, since pending-undo-list isn't buffer-local in the first place. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."