From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general Subject: Re: Emacs Bazaar repository Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:43:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1205408652 22522 80.91.229.12 (13 Mar 2008 11:44:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bazaar@lists.canonical.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Jason Earl Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 13 12:44:40 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZlrI-0008Oi-Cx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:44:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZlqj-0005do-Ex for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:43:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZlqe-0005ck-CZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JZlqc-0005bX-SU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:43:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JZlqc-0005bN-N2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JZlqc-0005vU-AK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:43:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F92C3B841; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:43:44 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: This PIZZA symbolizes my COMPLETE EMOTIONAL RECOVERY!! In-Reply-To: <87skyvse7k.fsf@xmission.com> (Jason Earl's message of "Wed\, 12 Mar 2008 17\:41\:03 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:92399 gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general:38445 Archived-At: My first impression is that bzr is slow, so slow that it is completely unusable. How can it come that a simple bzr log takes more than a minute to even start? Even cvs log is instantaneous in comparison, although it has to request the log from the server. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."