From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:56:01 +0100 Message-ID: References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87ps7x4clj.fsf@pacem.orebokech.com> <85irdpweuq.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1172487387 14956 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2007 10:56:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 10:56:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 26 11:56:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HLdWm-0007zd-4p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:56:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdWl-0006TR-LV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:56:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdWa-0006TC-Bv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdWY-0006T0-Ew for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HLdWY-0006Sx-Bs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:56:06 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HLdWW-0002zB-Tt; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:56:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC22712269; Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:56:02 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Are we live or on tape? In-Reply-To: <85649pw652.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:43:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66844 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> David Kastrup writes: >> >>> Do we have a _single_ developer who still has it on >> >> I do. >> >>> and has observed _benefits_ from its use? >> >> At least I didn't notice any negative impact so far. > > The symptom would be CPU load, and sluggish response of Emacs and the > system in general, when one leaves Emacs unattended for longer amounts > of time. I cannot say that I have seen this so far. The instance of Emacs I'm currently using was started 41 days ago, and I have another one running for 69 days (the latter is only used for irc). Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."