From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why Emacs needs a modern bug tracker Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:19:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20080104164454.0A4BD830697@snark.thyrsus.com> <20080105182456.GR30869@thyrsus.com> <20080105214810.GZ30869@thyrsus.com> <20080105233923.GH30869@thyrsus.com> <18304.10442.537860.246188@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87k5mnoge1.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <18304.21595.549190.232362@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18304.47586.476527.980890@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199625582 9316 80.91.229.12 (6 Jan 2008 13:19:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:19:42 +0000 (UTC) Cc: esr@thyrsus.com, esr@snark.thyrsus.com, Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Nick Roberts Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 06 14:20:01 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JBVQ0-0001bH-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:20:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBVPd-0000gH-3y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:19:37 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBVPZ-0000fn-3e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:19:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JBVPX-0000fI-HH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:19:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JBVPX-0000fF-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:19:31 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2] helo=mx1.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JBVPQ-0005Cp-9h; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 08:19:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Relay1.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E558D26417; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:19:21 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: AIEEEEE! I am having an UNDULATING EXPERIENCE! In-Reply-To: <18304.47586.476527.980890@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> (Nick Roberts's message of "Mon\, 7 Jan 2008 00\:22\:10 +1300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86324 Archived-At: Nick Roberts writes: > Can someone follow/participate in discussion of all bug reports from e-= mail > only by being subscribed to gcc-bugs? Yes. > Do all bug reports in gcc-bugs come from Bugzilla? gcc-bugs is a normal, open mailing list. From time to time it receives spam and other non-bugzilla mails. > What happens if someone tries to submit a bug report directly to > gcc-bugs without using Bugzilla? AFAIK only mail sent to gcc-bugzilla are seen by bugzilla, and all mails sent out by bugzilla have a reply-to header redirecting there. Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."