From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unicode Lisp reader escapes Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 11:04:35 +0200 Message-ID: References: <17491.34779.959316.484740@parhasard.net> <17498.27200.911709.330947@parhasard.net> <877j4z5had.fsf@gmx.de> <87irohfrx1.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1147683904 602 80.91.229.2 (15 May 2006 09:05:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 09:05:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alkibiades@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 15 11:05:01 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfZ0d-0002YD-AX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:04:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfZ0c-0004O7-S0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 05:04:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfZ0Q-0004O1-E0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 05:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FfZ0P-0004Ne-AL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 05:04:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfZ0P-0004NZ-1Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 05:04:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.135.220.15] (helo=mx2.suse.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1FfZ2i-00032Z-AX; Mon, 15 May 2006 05:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Relay2.suse.de (mail2.suse.de [195.135.221.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0031D8DC; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:04:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) X-Yow: ..Am I in a SOAP OPERA?? In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Mon, 15 May 2006 10:06:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:54495 Archived-At: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > Kenichi Handa writes: > >> But, as emacs-mule is not affected by >> unify-8859-on-decoding, we don't have to invent it as long >> as we suggest people to use emacs-mule in a problematic >> case. > > So why not _always_ use emacs-mule for .elc files (both on write > and on load)? =20 Don't we already? (setq file-coding-system-alist '(("\\.elc\\'" . (emacs-mule . emacs-mule)) ...) Andreas. --=20 Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstra=DFe 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint =3D 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED= 5 "And now for something completely different."