From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9423: lisp/server.el: Allow custom server-auth-key Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:14:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1314366861-27398-1-git-send-email-mina86@mina86.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334268900 16788 80.91.229.3 (12 Apr 2012 22:15:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9423@debbugs.gnu.org, Michal Nazarewicz To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 13 00:14:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SISI3-0005RG-21 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2012 00:14:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48144 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SISI2-0002Mf-Dl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:14:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39983) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SISHx-0002Im-TQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:14:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SISHw-0003aR-0O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:14:49 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SISHv-0003aF-Tm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:14:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SISJ8-0007Az-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9423 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 9423-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9423.133426892027516 (code B ref 9423); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 22:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9423) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Apr 2012 22:15:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55024 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SISIR-00079k-OJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:15:20 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54688) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SISIP-00079b-I1 for 9423@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:15:18 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SISHA-0002Hx-Oa; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 18:14:00 -0400 X-Spook: ASO Montenegro SCUD missile electronic surveillance X-Ran: h9vs[/>tp,m54ENN:"1q,kS-1?lvn7FUNpLLd"w]E)P4=\1Ch?vk#tz%OS.?3-.$d+-9c+ X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:46:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58956 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Anybody know? I've always assumed that the FSF needs assignment from > the person who wrote the code, even if their employer claims to own the > code. That's my assumption too. Ask assign@gnu for a definitive answer, I guess. Or just get an assignment anyway to be safe. (People in the US can do it entirely by email now, so it's not much work.)