From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Rodgers Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6339: url-filename => "/c:/some/file.txt" Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 23:09:08 -0600 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317877744 14637 80.91.229.12 (6 Oct 2011 05:09:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 05:09:04 +0000 (UTC) To: 6339@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 07:09:00 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCa-0002NA-7D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:09:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59777 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCZ-00084f-Ng for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47852) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCX-00084Z-8I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCV-0006V0-Uh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:57 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40647) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCV-0006Uw-Rs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCc-00075R-CM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Kevin Rodgers Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 05:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6339 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.131787773127223 (code B ref -1); Thu, 06 Oct 2011 05:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Oct 2011 05:08:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCR-000751-Bd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCN-00074o-Sd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCA-0006UK-Me for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:35 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]:35156) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgCA-0006UG-LC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47820) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgC9-00084U-OE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgC8-0006U6-Pt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:33 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:33641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgC8-0006U2-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:08:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RBgC5-0002HH-1M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: from c-71-237-25-24.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([71.237.25.24]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:08:29 +0200 Original-Received: from kevin.d.rodgers by c-71-237-25-24.hsd1.co.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 07:08:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 44 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-71-237-25-24.hsd1.co.comcast.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110920 Thunderbird/3.1.15 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 01:09:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52251 Archived-At: On 9/21/11 7:14 PM, Juanma Barranquero wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:07, Lennart Borgman > wrote: > >> If you say so ;-) > > Well, > >> Yes, but please remember if you make that interpretation (which I hope >> is the correct one) then "c:/some/file.txt" is an absolute local file >> name in URL file name syntax. > > This is what the RFC says. I even quoted it. > >> So if we hold on to that interpretation then maybe we should say (and >> document ;-) that url-filename returns such a file name > > This I didn't say (but any change or unexpected behavior should be documented). > >> and that it >> needs to be translated to the actually used systems file syntax to be >> used there. > > I explicitly talked about (concat "/" (url-filename ...)) Don't you mean: (expand-file-name (url-filename ...) "/") >> This would be an incompatible change from the current (faulty) >> behaviour, but I think it would be the best. > > This is what I've been saying in pretty much every message from this thread. > > So yes, "I say so". > > Juanma > > > > -- Kevin Rodgers Denver, Colorado, USA