From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18482: 24.4.50; msb-mode error Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410812838 10374 80.91.229.3 (15 Sep 2014 20:27:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18482@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dieter Faulbaum Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 15 22:27:12 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcrg-0001Jx-GP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 22:27:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33917 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcrf-0002Ro-UJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:27:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47425) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcrb-0002P4-3p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:27:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcra-0000WF-1K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:27:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcrZ-0000W0-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:27:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcrW-0006RD-DT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:27:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18482 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18482-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18482.141081279824717 (code B ref 18482); Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18482) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Sep 2014 20:26:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41653 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcr7-0006Qa-Hi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:37 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:59667) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcr5-0006QS-3g for 18482@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:35 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTcr2-00049U-CG; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 16:26:32 -0400 X-Spook: MILSATCOM UFO BLU-114/B security Agfa secure JUWTF anarchy X-Ran: wI/{/m&?#vwY?zU>g-,|~=!Q33dx!.X$48:Y">T$7q$~_XXZl-)@]+NxF`WLlQb3~V'2Uv X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93390 Archived-At: Dieter Faulbaum wrote: > When msb-mode is switched on selecting another buffer gives this error: > > command-execute: Wrong type argument: commandp, ((nil) . menu-bar-select-buffer) Sounds like the same root cause as http://debbugs.gnu.org/18016 . So probably the same kind of change will fix it, but are the r117463 simplification changes still desirable in light of this? (Also, they don't seem to have a NEWS entry.)