From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Simon Josefsson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 21.2, smtpmail and vm Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:29:50 +0100 Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <5lbs21856e.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1043862728 13003 80.91.224.249 (29 Jan 2003 17:52:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:52:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dwNZ-0003NK-00 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:52:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18dwMg-00052y-09 for gnu-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:51:10 -0500 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!uio.no!news.kth.se!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 15 Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: fnatte.nada.kth.se User-Agent: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) X-Face: )=Tu!-Q9f9BQASOHl~_&4r0`,OQD2*=;cm+4]m[twz:8t5yt@xQW+:T$K%AdKq)`"g; C%>s /8w~Upcau`W2wh$=#"g7]"[2c; 1Z/S:B49XEy$-YlaAGc'ZM&U*el'yQAD"c):Lc:fUD-S=\!EV;n@ 1Jff} Cancel-Lock: sha1:C9dM3uLBYcRdpaHtv/NZepyviR8= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:109533 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+gnu-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:6051 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help:6051 "Stefan Monnier " writes: >>>>>> "Chris" == Chris Hall writes: >> Switched ISP's a while back, requires SMTP AUTH, I had been using >> other mail clients, they no problem w/SMTP AUTH. > > Could anybody give me the skinny about "why would an ISP require SMTP AUTH" ? Isn't the answer the same as why authentication is required it all, in any protocol? If you are thinking that ISPs should use IP based ACLs to allow relaying for their customers, it's not going to work with todays computer habits (people travel with their laptop and expect the mail server to continue to work).