From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uday S Reddy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Memory leaks Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 18:00:45 +0000 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1299175271 12263 80.91.229.12 (3 Mar 2011 18:01:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:01:11 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 03 19:01:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvCpn-00073L-0d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:01:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvCpm-0001M7-6R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:01:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53804 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PvCpe-0001L4-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:00:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvCpd-0001LW-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:00:58 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:55962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PvCpd-0001LA-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 13:00:57 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PvCpb-0006wV-WF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:00:56 +0100 Original-Received: from cpc10-harb6-0-0-cust112.perr.cable.virginmedia.com ([92.232.137.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:00:55 +0100 Original-Received: from u.s.reddy by cpc10-harb6-0-0-cust112.perr.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:00:55 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc10-harb6-0-0-cust112.perr.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:136744 Archived-At: On 3/3/2011 5:55 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > In general no memory is reclaimed until the next garbage collection (but > the buffer text is freed immediately). Yes, of course. I guess they become "reclaimable" after a buffer is killed. So, if I have memory leaking, it would seem that the only possibility is from global variables? Cheers, Uday