From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Spencer Baugh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71094: [PATCH] Prefer to run find and grep in parallel in rgrep Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <86ttiq6or8.fsf@gnu.org> <86msocx5u3.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15190"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 71094@debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry@gutov.dev To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 30 14:30:40 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sCevX-0003in-4q for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 14:30:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCeun-0005ZQ-Hy; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:53 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCeum-0005ZH-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sCeum-0006wC-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sCeuw-0006rB-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:30:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Spencer Baugh Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 12:30:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 71094-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71094.171707216426256 (code B ref 71094); Thu, 30 May 2024 12:30:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71094) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2024 12:29:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33095 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sCeuJ-0006pQ-MC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mxout1.mail.janestreet.com ([38.105.200.78]:40049) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sCeuG-0006p6-MW for 71094@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 May 2024 08:29:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <86msocx5u3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 26 May 2024 12:47:32 +0300") DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=waixah; t=1717072144; bh=/BhkUQ87dmPHqfLoTVyHVzJGjU9OxkJ03XwZfp1HQrg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=KVgi3ZXZdVMNi6G640LjLJY3K9q1qizVGEv+4KAmlzrz/oky2obYayZ+/Lk/MXHRL 5r/j5EerlrBJ1+o6HGb4OE5890qAk3kXHLO+xsxAdikDHX5N33/2+x/EbV/oS//F8Z DXJp7N1zIRl1r2HEqo2dfl8njE8UQRRfayOYhpFUDRodU6QB8gnYyE/0lBBY6khfI9 gq56ZQYumPFWWTVlksMrSZoMI8lx95F+zT3VfMc1Icw7XhRbr07mp+Go6SNa6bcCFt +iXR6A2ZhgsVgkj4a7NKop0+8Kt01FbTKQYOYID8D+Ypw/HxVNjz5/2WyzDHMbNs1w iB5WxSJp3OHdw== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286221 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Spencer Baugh >> Cc: rgm@gnu.org, 71094@debbugs.gnu.org, dmitry@gutov.dev >> Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 08:54:25 -0400 >> >> > In any case, please modify the patch so that 'exec-plus' is still >> > preferred on MS-Windows (because most Windows ports of xargs are IME >> > abysmally buggy, so better avoided as much as possible). >> > >> > A comment there with the justification of the order will also be >> > appreciated. >> >> Done, attached. > > Thanks, LGTM. So is this OK to install now? We have had benchmarking on several platforms and they all report either a performance improvement or no change.