From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Lilja Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290521259 32238 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 14:07:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 14:07:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 15:07:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKtWv-00020d-S1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:07:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57494 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKtWv-0003w9-7D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:07:33 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41112 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKtWj-0003tA-O7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:07:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKtWe-0000O9-Ap for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:07:21 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKtWe-0000No-5u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:07:16 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKtWc-0001tZ-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:07:14 +0100 Original-Received: from h-61-27.a163.priv.bahnhof.se ([79.136.61.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:07:14 +0100 Original-Received: from mindcooler by h-61-27.a163.priv.bahnhof.se with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:07:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h-61-27.a163.priv.bahnhof.se User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133046 Archived-At: On 2010-11-23 03:20, Eric Lilja wrote: > On 2010-11-22 23:11, Sean Sieger wrote: >> The trunk was built and runs successfully on Windows. Binaries have >> been published in >> >> http://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/emacs/windows/ >> >> >> > > Why is it ~9 MB smaller than the previous set (and I'm talking about the > NOT-barebin version)? > > -EL > > > Unpacked the difference is almost 30 MB and the reason is that the binaries in this latest set are much smaller than before. emacs.exe, for instance, went from 37.6 MB to 13.8 MB. I have no idea if this hints at a problem at all. - EL