Re: garbace collection of point-markers

[Barry Margolin <barmar@genuity.net>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1041 bytes --]

In article <87vg05yu6h.fsf@thalassa.informatimago.com>,
Pascal Bourguignon  <pjb@informatimago.com> wrote:
>kai.grossjohann@uni-duisburg.de (Kai Großjohann) writes:
>
>> Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:
>> 
>> > Note that in emacs, the reader does not
>> > convert-case the symbols.  So (not (eq 'DONT-COPY-P 'dont-copy-p))
>> 
>> It seems customary to refer to the args of a function by uppercase
>> names.  Type C-h f kill-buffer RET for an example.
>
>Exact.  But as a typographical distinction. Now that we have bolds and
>italics and  fonts, perhaps they should  just be put in  bold and stay
>low case.  When  you work with Common-Lisp in  addition to emacs lisp,
>it's usefull to keep the distinction in mind.

Perhaps in Emacs documentation, but in Usenet you should limit yourself to
simple ASCII.

-- 
Barry Margolin, barmar@genuity.net
Genuity, Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.