From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gary Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Face differences between emacs-nox & windows-nt Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:21 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286461485 14450 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2010 14:24:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:24:45 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 07 16:24:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rOQ-0006be-CN for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:24:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3rOP-0002mG-Nj for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58144 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P3rNm-0002l5-G8 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:23:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rNl-0006JS-9C for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:23:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:42224) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rNl-0006JD-3R for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:23:41 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P3rNf-0006PM-C2 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:35 +0200 Original-Received: from ge-u-fw01.ggamaur.net ([213.160.40.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:35 +0200 Original-Received: from help-gnu-emacs by ge-u-fw01.ggamaur.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 16:23:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ge-u-fw01.ggamaur.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (cygwin) X-No-Archive: Yes Mail-Copies-To: never X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-Gmane-Expiry: 2010-10-21 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:75087 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Gary >> Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 11:01:35 +0200 >> Mail-Copies-To: never >> >> Is there any reason for these differences for the "Basic default > face"? >> >> emacs-nox: >> [...] >> windows-nt > > Yes: the former is a text terminal, the latter is a GUI session. > Emacs cannot control the fonts and default colors of a text terminal. > It can do that on a graphics display. Can I persuade it to not do it on a graphics display :)