From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5094: url-copy-file: Reading [text/plain] ... 16 bytes of 5 bytes (320%) Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:22:30 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310430207 8252 80.91.229.12 (12 Jul 2011 00:23:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:23:27 +0000 (UTC) To: 5094-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 02:23:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQl0-0003YU-LP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 02:23:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55003 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkz-0004AZ-Ds for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:23:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQki-0004AB-39 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:23:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkh-0004js-7A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:23:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44818) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkg-0004jg-W1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:23:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkg-0002xJ-4a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:23:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 5094 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Mail-Followup-To: 5094@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 5094-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D5094.131043015811327 (code D ref 5094); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 00:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5094-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 00:22:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkI-0002we-Gj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:22:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkG-0002wT-Be for 5094-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:22:37 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60369) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QgQkA-0006HX-Te; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:22:31 -0400 X-Spook: Watergate terrorism target Medco Centro president smuggle X-Ran: gZ}AG}vP?<;.P:ibE>F@Pq0o=5rBdy8!y"}/`uD?q:v*7,`.KzPw,"T2s-(G:n_U,TZl;7 X-Hue: green X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Tue, 1 Dec 2009 19:28:16 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 20:23:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48684 Archived-At: Lennart Borgman wrote: > Someone needs to teach url-copy-file about percentage. Or perhaps > something else. 16/5 is 320%. Maybe the initial estimate of how much data there was to retrieve was inaccurate. I think I've seen this kind of thing several times with various web browsers. If you have a specific example of a URL that shows the problem, then please reopen or reply to this report. Otherwise I don't think there is anything to be done.