From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Don't report new bugs for Rmail?? Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:48:28 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20090131104403.GQ4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090131211929.GT4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090131222401.GU4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <20090201043312.GA4175@volo.donarmstrong.com> <35ab95txsr.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233600711 14927 80.91.229.12 (2 Feb 2009 18:51:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Don Armstrong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 02 19:53:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LU3ue-0007mm-WC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:52:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35662 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LU3tM-00037R-D9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:51:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LU3s8-0002EJ-Iz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LU3s7-0002CD-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51419 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LU3s6-0002C3-MT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38096) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LU3s6-0007ck-CK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LU3qO-00035i-3Q; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:48:28 -0500 X-Spook: SP4 Ruby Ridge enforcers Rumsfeld Islam Abduganievich X-Ran: "6%P.d)QWEZIG6a0o_`a-s\ZMf8FxXS?/8/\@Pu2+K*"N]CEzAWDNs~f}K%+)Te|Wk<&%/ X-Hue: magenta X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:20:22 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108617 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > I think that should instead be bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org. > Otherwise bug reports and notifications about rmail are going to start > appearing on emacs-devel rather than bug-gnu-emacs. [...] > Since we assign bugs to both the emacs _and_ the rmail package, does > this mean we will start getting two copies of things? I see that both of the above are true. Messages from the control server about rmail are now cc'd to both emacs-devel and bug-gnu-emacs. This is not what we want to happen. I think the rmail maintainer should just be "unknown" again. It was working perfectly fine that way.