From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Uday S Reddy Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23, so slow to refresh on Windows Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 09:12:46 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8CCC3DAB0774A32-16F0-1536@web-mmc-d09.sysops.aol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274200594 13085 80.91.229.12 (18 May 2010 16:36:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 16:36:34 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 18 18:36:33 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEPmS-0003a3-HG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 18:36:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEPmR-0008Fu-N4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:36:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36491 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEPmJ-0008EQ-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 12:36:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEHvQ-0006T9-Vw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 04:15:55 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:43723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEHvQ-0006S3-E1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 04:13:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEHvM-0006AW-Ka for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:13:12 +0200 Original-Received: from cpc10-harb6-0-0-cust112.perr.cable.virginmedia.com ([92.232.137.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:13:12 +0200 Original-Received: from u.s.reddy by cpc10-harb6-0-0-cust112.perr.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 May 2010 10:13:12 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc10-harb6-0-0-cust112.perr.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <8CCC3DAB0774A32-16F0-1536@web-mmc-d09.sysops.aol.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124900 Archived-At: On 5/17/2010 2:19 PM, bogossian@mail.com wrote: > To illustrate the slow down, I built an 8MB file containing a single line. > I opened the file in emacs, and then I hit "ESC >" to reach the end of the > buffer. I measured the time it takes for emacs to refresh from the moment > I typed the macro. Here are the results: > > Emacs 21.3.1: 8s > Emacs 22.3.1: 14s > Emacs 23.2.1: 63s Hi, does it make a difference if you turn on the visual-line-mode in the buffer? Cheers, Uday