From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Is it possible for a macro to expand to nothing?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: muc.de e.V.
Message-ID: <heedd6$1p5e$1@colin2.muc.de>
References: <hee7rf$15su$1@colin2.muc.de>
	<mailman.11344.1258992201.2239.help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1258994536 22033 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2009 16:42:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:42:16 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:42:09 2009
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1NCbzM-0000wO-SZ
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:42:09 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53501 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NCbzM-00087o-F1
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:42:08 -0500
Original-Path: news.stanford.edu!usenet.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!kanaga.switch.ch!switch.ch!news.belwue.de!news.tu-darmstadt.de!news.muc.de!not-for-mail
Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help
Original-Lines: 43
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: marvin.muc.de
Original-X-Trace: colin2.muc.de 1258993894 58542 2001:608:1000::2 (23 Nov 2009 16:31:34
	GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: news-admin@muc.de
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-RELEASE (i386))
Original-Xref: news.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:174981
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:70052
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/70052>

Drew Adams <drew.adams@oracle.com> wrote:
>> That is, not to a call to a null defun, but truly to nothing:  i.e.,
>> the ensuing code (as least, when byte compiled) will be identical  to
>> what it would have been, had the macro invocation been omitted.

>> I want something like this:

>> (defmacro ifdef (condition &rest forms)
>>   "If the compile time CONDITION is non-nil, dump the FORMS to the
>> calling defun.  Otherwise do nothing."
>>   ......)

> Hi Alan,

> I'm not sure what you mean.

You might not be the only one.  ;-)

I think I want to be able to do this:

    (defun foo ()
      (setq bar 1)
      (ifdef baz (setq bar 2)))

, and if baz is nil at compile time, this function should be identical to

    (defun foo ()
      (setq bar 1))

.

> But if you mean something like "insert nothing", then you can do that
> by producing nil and then using ,@ inside a backquote. IOW, instead of
> inserting nil, you splice it in, which means inserting nothing.

That means I need to have "`,@" in the invoking defun, doesn't it?  Maybe
that would work, even if it is ugly.

> HTH.

-- 
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).