From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#461: delete-window means "get out of my face" even for sole window Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:32:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87k5gj5e5t.fsf@jidanni.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310236475 11910 80.91.229.12 (9 Jul 2011 18:34:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 18:34:35 +0000 (UTC) To: 461-done@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 09 20:34:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcMF-00030W-D5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:34:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46843 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcME-00058k-2n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:34:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcLs-00057z-Ur for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcLr-0004if-Cl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:34:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcLr-0004iQ-4L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:34:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcLq-0000YB-L1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:34:02 -0400 Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 461 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix Mail-Followup-To: 461@debbugs.gnu.org, rgm@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 461-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D461.13102363842045 (code D ref 461); Sat, 09 Jul 2011 18:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 461-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2011 18:33:04 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcKt-0000Ww-Uk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:33:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcKr-0000WS-R3 for 461-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35054) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QfcKm-0005po-72; Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:32:56 -0400 X-Spook: Albright CID AUTODIN military Rand Corporation KGB threat X-Ran: :}JJ2d7KyjQSl^ (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 21 Jun 2008 20:58:08 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Jul 2011 14:34:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48351 Archived-At: I don't see a need to keep open this particular report, which was marked "wontfix" some time ago. Stefan Monnier wrote: > There's already "C-x b RET", "C-x ", "C-x " and probably > several other ways to do what you want, so I see no need to change > C-x 0 in the way you suggest. > > C-x 0 currently doesn't care about buffers, only about windows, so your > "extension" doesn't seem very natural to me.