From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: don@donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#919: marked as done (distributions in lzma or bz2?) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:40:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <200809071848.m87ImXL08116@f7.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1220820005-1204-0" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220820574 28179 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2008 20:49:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:49:34 +0000 (UTC) To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 07 22:50:28 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KcRDG-0000cO-8Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:50:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34899 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRCG-0002In-Ic for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:49:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRAZ-0000zY-KW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRAX-0000xv-Ta for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37467 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcRAW-0000xe-FQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:36837) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcRAV-0004ID-MC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:47:36 -0400 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87KlW3x004335; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:47:33 -0700 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m87Ke5fj001317; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:40:05 -0700 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.420 (Entity 5.420) X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed 919 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:20317 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1220820005-1204-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 with message-id <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> and subject line distributions in lzma or bz2? has caused the Emacs bug report #919, regarding distributions in lzma or bz2? to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com immediately.) --=20 919: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D919 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems ------------=_1220820005-1204-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 18:48:43 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87Imdjx026895 for ; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 11:48:41 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJP-00054m-DY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJN-00052K-WA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:39 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37860 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KcPJN-00052F-Pb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39106) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJN-00065N-KF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from mx10.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166]:40385) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPHh-0008R1-UG for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:46:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJK-000653-Sh for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:37 -0400 Received: from server1.f7.net ([64.34.169.74]:51162 helo=f7.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KcPJK-00064t-Hv for bug-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:48:34 -0400 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org X-Envelope-To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id m87ImXL08116; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500 Message-Id: <200809071848.m87ImXL08116@f7.net> From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) To: bug-emacs@gnu.org Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2? X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) emacs-22.3.tar.gz is 39587396 bytes. Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes. (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.) That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved. How about making it available both ways, at least for next time? (= install lzma-utils from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the automake options.) Best, karl ------------=_1220820005-1204-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at 919-done) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 7 Sep 2008 20:34:36 +0000 Received: from cyd.mit.edu (CYD.MIT.EDU [18.115.2.24]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m87KYXvj031869 for <919-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:34:34 -0700 Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 705A957E355; Sun, 7 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Chong Yidong To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Cc: 919-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2? Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400 Message-ID: <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > emacs-22.3.tar.gz is 39587396 bytes. > Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes. > (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.) > > That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved. How about making it > available both ways, at least for next time? (= install lzma-utils > from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the > automake OK, I've made a not to do that. ------------=_1220820005-1204-0--