From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#897: marked as done (Huge numbers of duplicate mails) Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:37:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <99myimlbir.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_1264192622-12334-0" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1264192855 3460 80.91.229.12 (22 Jan 2010 20:40:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-bug-tracker@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 22 21:40:47 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NYQJA-0001zF-CM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 21:40:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36116 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NYQJB-0008JI-IS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:40:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NYQIi-00086Z-14 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:40:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NYQIa-00083E-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=35506 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NYQIU-00081D-RE; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58462) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NYQIP-0002dh-W4; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:39:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYQFa-0003Cy-6k; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:37:02 -0500 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.427 (Entity 5.427) X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: closed 897 X-Emacs-PR-Package: debbugs.gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34640 Archived-At: This is a multi-part message in MIME format... ------------=_1264192622-12334-0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Your message dated Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:36:26 -0500 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#897 has caused the Emacs bug report #897, regarding Huge numbers of duplicate mails to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org immediately.) --=20 897: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D897 Emacs Bug Tracking System Contact bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org with problems ------------=_1264192622-12334-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (2007-08-08) on rzlab.ucr.edu X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.0 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=3.2.3-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Received: (at submit) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 5 Sep 2008 18:00:59 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [199.232.76.165]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m85I0qYx006513 for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2008 11:00:53 -0700 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbfc4-0001xg-LA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:00:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbfc2-0001xJ-I6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:00:51 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48499 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kbfc1-0001xG-UX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:00:49 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:59956) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kbfc1-0000hp-CE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:00:49 -0400 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1KbfaO-0003hn-4l; Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:59:08 -0400 From: Glenn Morris To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Subject: Huge numbers of duplicate mails X-Spook: kilderkin Semtex Qaddafi Peking Lexis-Nexis Telex AIEWS X-Ran: %{)E95.F4095>{_c&op#Ll.L{anMNa6r&Jx"c!$5*6l&,J-]"+TB{+n~6qv@_E)!+&9wi5 X-Hue: cyan X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:59:08 -0400 Message-ID: <99myimlbir.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Package: emacs,emacsbugs Almost every mail on the bug-gnu-emacs mailing list is duplicated. Mailman at least seems to filter them from the html archives, but if you are subscribed to the list, or look at the gnu.emacs.bug newsgroup you can see them. It happens because people keep using followup to reply to all the addresses in a bug report, ie they send mail to both: 123@emacsbugs and bug-gnu-emacs (or emacs-pretest-bugs). This was traditionally the Right Thing to do in these lists, so it will be hard to get people to change. Perhaps bug #430 (wish...) will help with this, but here is another suggestion: If emacsbugs sees that bug-gnu-emacs or emacs-pretest-bug is already Cc'd on a reply to bug, it should avoid sending out another copy to the list. Ie, it treats it as a "quiet" submission only to be entered in the tracker. (Presumably there must already be some logic to handle this case, because it at least avoids creating a new numbered bug report.) ------------=_1264192622-12334-0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: (at 897-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Jan 2010 20:36:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYQF5-0003Cg-1A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:36:31 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYQF4-0003CZ-AC for 897-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:36:30 -0500 Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NYQF0-0001k2-4F; Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:36:26 -0500 To: 897-done@debbugs.gnu.org Subject: Re: Bug#897 From: Glenn Morris X-Spook: War on Terrorism illuminati Panama fundamentalist George X-Ran: KGVRS9N!`tJdZi#7MXrV=[;a/T!BDmwscIW|o`5)y|tTL_Hi"a4M8/QprE/"=~7p{p33Mw X-Hue: black X-Debbugs-No-Ack: yes X-Attribution: GM Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 15:36:26 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 897-done X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----) Recent changes ought to gradually make duplicate emails less common. (See bug#5384). This is still not perfect, so I'll open a new, shorter bug with the remaining issues. ------------=_1264192622-12334-0--