bug#474: marked as done (pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem)

[don@donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System)]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 865 bytes --]


Your message dated Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:08:30 -0400
with message-id <873aln2q1d.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
and subject line Re: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem
has caused the Emacs bug report #465,
regarding pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
465: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2531 bytes --]

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>
To: "ken manheimer" <ken.manheimer@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, emacs-devel <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:42:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87mylb2jxt.fsf@ambire.localdomain>

() "ken manheimer" <ken.manheimer@gmail.com>
() Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:44:52 -0400

   the hang happens at the first
   '(accept-process-output process)'.

What happens if you convert
  (accept-process-output process)
to
  (accept-process-output)
?

thi



[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1087 bytes --]

From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: 465-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 15:08:30 -0400
Message-ID: <873aln2q1d.fsf@stupidchicken.com>

I've checked in a fix for this (verified by Ken Manheimer via private
email).  This fix is in pgg-gpg.el, which I think was calling
accept-process-output in a slightly incorrect way.